Reflecting on Peer Comments, paper 2

Reflecting on Peer Comments, paper 2

IDEAS

It was a good idea t0 juxtapose Gee and Delpit, so I kept this section in my revised essay. This was a specific comment, but it didn’t help me revise.

EVIDENCE

I needed to better explain the difference between primary and secondary Discourses, which was a specific comment. I added these definitions to my introduction so that the rest of my paper would make more sense.

A commenter said I have great statements toward my claim, which wasn’t helpful because it wasn’t specific, so I wasn’t sure exactly what statements were working well. This comment didn’t aid in my revision.

ORGANIZATION 

I needed to adjust my organization in the fifth paragraph because I had two expandable ideas. This was helpful because it was specific. I used this comment and in my final draft, the ideas appear in two separate paragraphs.

LOCAL

Someone asked why I only referenced people of color. This was more of a question, but it was specific.  This didn’t aid my revision because the source I was elaborating on was talking only about people of color.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php